[ld_series_img field="ep_hero"]

We Don’t Agree on America’s Founding Story. Do We Need To?

Americans struggle to agree on even the most basic parts of America’s founding story. Some say it was divine intervention. Others, a scheme to profit off slavery, or simply a pursuit of freedom. Can we ever really agree on national narrative? Do we even need to? People are complicated and so is history. But when it comes to national narratives and founding stories, we tend to assume only one story can be right – and it’s the version that most aligns with our own feelings about America. Simplicity might not be necessary, though. Can a founding story be complicated and contradictory and still do its job? In this podcast episode, a professor of classics recounts how the myth of Romulus and Remus laid a narrative foundation for the rise of the Roman empire. A history scholar explores America’s unique need for a founding story and traces the contributions of George Bancroft, William Gilmore Simms and Frederick Douglass. And a history curriculum designer encourages us to think differently about teaching American history and the nation’s narrative.
[ld_series_img field="series_logo" class="series-logo" alt="Series logo"]

More Episodes

RETt6zc0fbCfH0xj13EWl78IZE9TyglDW0YnimZ6cdo_wj9or6
pioaa9HqUXGpmHvwYlmqLaeK_yPUWwOp-gfXpaF-BBA_iep0k9
rQ_R_xDrdLr_XZH58Kd_O9MX2dkrlK8IKOpsOx7TbR0_cyx620
1TYPYfGQgDdWsxWQolodUVk3_tUcslMPty0XvNKjjjM_w0t7ap